This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In regards to the personal cost section, is this worthy of a separate section and are there any facts to back up these reported losses ?
Seems odd to include in an encyclopedia, especially with no back up, other than what looks like one persons opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watchtower3 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Have added a link to the decision in the most recent defamation case (2014) Not vandalism; it made me do a manual edit as it was linking to a PDF. Also updated out of date info on Mark Lundy, though I am not sure why Mark Lundy needs to be a part of this article? NZgreygoose (talk) 11:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)