Talk:Joan Roughgarden
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joan Roughgarden article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 30 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rsmorehouse17. Peer reviewers: Kaitmeade, Carleyg98.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Relation to Tim Roughgarden?
editI don't think it's worth mentioning in the article itself, but is Joan Roughgarden related to a current professor in Computer Science at Stanford University named Tim Roughgarden? 128.12.18.122 (talk) 06:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Top importance article
editJoan sounds like a woman of great wit, courage and patience. Perhaps the clean-up tag is fair. I'd prefer to say Joan is notable on many counts and the article should do her more justice, including fair reporting of criticisms. I don't mean to suggest any bias, I mean only to suggest there is more information out there (even in the links already provided). Hopefully we'll get to work and expand this to be a fascinating article on a fascinating woman, and/or person. She will certainly stretch our use of pronouns. ;) Alastair Haines 09:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
editLiving person, non-notable, non-public figure, her claims about sexual selection are debunked (thus are not notable contributions), her book about reconciling evolution with Catholicism is fringe at best, and this article reads more or less like a curriculum vitae and a source of publicity for her. --70.131.82.165 (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- This suggestion does not seem appropriate. Roughgarden is a very well known scientist at a major university. Just check Google Scholar to see how often her papers are cited, to get a hold of her influence in science. About her Theory of Sexual Selection, the very fact that so many scientists reacted to it, makes it worthwhile aspect to report in Wikipedia.
- That said, there is of course room for improving the article and in particular describing her contributions in more detail. Mashkin (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the nomination, 70. However, as Mashkin says, this person is notable under Wikipedia's established guidelines. Whilst the article needs clean-up, it would not be deleted by the AfD process (at least not for the reasons you have given) so I must decline the request to list it at this time. Contact me if you have other reasons or want more information. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ has nothing to declare except his jeans 14:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Agree with Mashkin and ❝ЯEDVERS❞. While, yes, Roughgarden's more recent work on sexual selection is not widely accepted within the scientific community, she is well-known in ecological circles for some classic studies on rocky shore ecology. Notability is pretty clear-cut here (though I do say that as a biologist). Cheers, --PLUMBAGO 14:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- "Her book about reconciling evolution with Catholicism is fringe at best" - Isn't that called a bias? 98.198.83.12 (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Joan Roughgarden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071008183805/http://www.fccb.org/programs/details.php?eventID=190 to http://www.fccb.org/programs/details.php?eventID=190
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100713195521/https://www.californiasciencecenter.org/GenInfo/NewsAndEvents/SpecialPrograms/ScienceMatters/Religion/Bio.php?bio=roughgarden to http://www.californiasciencecenter.org/GenInfo/NewsAndEvents/SpecialPrograms/ScienceMatters/Religion/Bio.php?bio=roughgarden
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Is this sentence really the best
editShe is best known for her rejection of sexual selection and her theistic evolutionism.
Her rejection of sexual selection doesn’t seem like a ideal sentence. This source states that Over the last 130 years, research has established that (a) sexual selection exists and is widespread in the plant and animal kingdoms So at this point denying sexual selection is like denying evolution. Her denial of sexual selection is just fringe.CycoMa (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC)