This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Jo Inkpin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Jo Inkpin was Australia's first openly transgender Anglican priest?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Jo Inkpin is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of the Australian Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australian Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Australian Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Australian Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Australian Women in ReligionAustralian Women in Religion articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1:... that Jo Inkpin was the first transgender priest installed by a mainstream Australian church? Source:[1] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Overall: There is an unsourced statement in the Writing section of the article concerning authorship of a website called Trans Spirit Flourishing which needs to be sourced before the nomination can proceed. Additionally, the CopyVio detector returned an extremely high hit on the following page: [2]. This is due to the bibliography present in both this article and that page. The formatting is extremely similar, and unstandardized, and should probably be reformatted with the cite book template. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Update: I've thinned the bibliography and converted them to book citations to reduce the copyvio score, as well as removing some of the entries which appeared to be blog entries that I could not verify. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Update: The unsourced statement mentioned above has been rectified. by the nominator. Everything looks good now, DrMushEa, excellent work here and thank you for your prompt fix of the source issue! /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In just about any instance (taking a husband's last name; being adopted as a child; taking a performance or activist name; taking a religious name), the name the person received at birth would be given, with no problem. But with the obsession over this thing called "deadnaming" it is verboten in this case. But the irony here is that, in view of the chronology given here, Dr. Inkpin must have written Dr. Inkpin's doctoral dissertation under Dr. Inkpin's given name--the one we must pretend never existed. That could create some small difficulties for someone who might want to look up Dr. Inkpin's dissertation. Uporządnicki (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply