Talk:Jeff Wooller

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Sources

edit
  • Morris, Nigel (7 January 2008). "Investigating the bogus education scam". BBC. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  • "2008 - Magazine WINNER - BBC London News". Circom Regional. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  • Walshe, John (8 January 2008). "State in threat to sue fake Irish university". Irish Independent. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  • Shapiro, Isabel (18 January 2008). "Fake 'Oxbridge educations' for sale over the internet" (PDF). Varsity. p. 1. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  • Kennedy, Dominic (7 January 2008). "Bogus university duped top businesswoman into handing out its degrees". The Times. Retrieved 12 July 2013.

Others

edit
  • Martin, Dan (7 July 2006). "Anstee resignation: Wanted - A man of the people". Accounting WEB. Retrieved 12 July 2013. Jeff Wooller says the new chief executive's first task should be to reduce the Council down to a "reasonable" size. "New Council recruits should be cut down by 50% until such time as numbers are reduced to around 36," he says. ... Good communication is also the key requirement of AccountingWEB members. Paul Druckman says the successful candidate should have a strong "ability to get on with people", while Jeff Wooller believes he should be a "man of the people".
  • Rodgers, Paul (23 June 1996). "Accountants in 'hypocrisy' revolt". The Independent. Retrieved 9 November 2013.
  • Willcock, John (5 June 1996). "Baring goes over to the gnomes of Warburgs". The Independent. Retrieved 9 November 2013.
  • Trapp, Roger (12 June 1996). "Finance: Opening up the books". The Independent. Retrieved 9 November 2013.

 Tentinator  11:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Letters

edit

Letters written by Wooller that were published by Accountancy Age:

 Tentinator  11:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bias of this page?

edit

I came across this article as Jeff Wooller was listed as a "notable resident" of Monte Carlo. To me it seems that this article is very euphemistic, and does not clearly explain that this person has been excluded from professional accounting organisations for being involved with scam universities. I think this should be much more prominently explained in the article, as in the current state there is no mention of the reasons why Jeff Wooller has been excluded - you have to read the references of the article in order to discover the serious credibility issues with this man. To be honest I'm pretty suspicious that this article has been written mainly by Jeff Wooller himself.

Kiwi Man (talk) 11:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jeff Wooller/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 17:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 17:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Here the issues I found:

  • The first paragraph of early career is essentially that he was a former this and former that, so it gets a bit repetitive. Could we either get dates added to get a better idea of his career or having it reworded a bit for better flow?
  • I've beefed up the Early life and career section and added some dates.   Tentinator  
  • We have two one-sentence paragraphs in that section; combine them into other ones or expand those spots a bit so they aren't stand-alone sentences. Also see the next point:
  • "In 2007, Wooller lost his membership as an Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Financial Accountants after appearing on television.[13]" Okay, there's either a lot I'm missing here or a lot the article's missing. Is there more to it? Just "appearing on television" makes me feel like there's information missing, since I'm fairly certain that showing up on TV wouldn't automatically remove someone from an organization. Also, 2007 doesn't qualify as early career, so maybe that sentence should be moved elsewhere in the article. (The quote in the ref, ironically, provides the detail I'm looking for that is omitted in the article.)
  • The Institute section has a lot of paragraphs starting with "In [year]...". Restructure a bit so it's not repetitive.
  • "executive of the ICAEW be elected directly, by the 109,000 members of the body" rm comma
  • "ICAEW be allowed to vote on Gerrard's key constitutional reform proposals" who's Gerrard? (first name and link or description)
  • Ref #45 (Capital Barter) needs a publisher/date or accessdate if possible.
  • There's a couple articles where heavy quotes in the refs are used where any can access them (namely the plagiarized mba one). I'd majorly trim that one and others. For those where many would not have access to them (the ebscohost ones, for example), I'm okay with the quotes even if they are a bit lengthy; there's only five quote-in-refs total anyway so this is probably an overreaction.

I'll put the article on hold and will pass when issues are fixed. Wizardman 18:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 03:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jeff Wooller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply