Talk:Jean Mandler

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

The article is neutral in tone and has no copyeight problems Any adjectives are factual descriptions widely used in the academic literature. Gmandler (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Widely used in the academic literature? Where? THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  - Sorry, I mean that dexriptions about book awards and such things as "widely used" can be found in the academic literature as the Fellowhip awards of the American Academy and in scholarly articles. Please indicate what particular expressions you find unacceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmandler (talk • contribs) 17:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
    - I get the feeling you don't quite understand what it means to source something. As stated before, please read WP:RS. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 06:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I never claimed to be unrelated to her. The article - as I have tried to convey - is moderate, much less laudatory that some of her appraisals in reviews etc. However, I would be happy to change anything you can point to diretcly. No i bstances of an unwanted SPA are included. GMandler —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmandler (talk • contribs) 13:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The references (listed in SOURceS) are direct or indirect commentaries (all positive) on her work, particularly FOUNDATIONS OF MIND. I am unclear how inline citations could be used for these references. As to the conflict of interest - the article is objective in tone and actually less laudatory that the review by Carey for example of the citation by the APA for her life's work. If something specific could be pointed out I would be happy to respond. GMandler. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmandler (talk • contribs) 16:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC) I have added another source for the APA award. In finding sources for notables the general source is other people's description of their work - in addition to their books as a source of their notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmandler (talk • contribs) 07:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC) As to conflict of interest - Again I do not see this, please tell me where it might appear. All the work described and her career etc are in the public domain and BTW have no conflict of interest - nothing was copied from something else ```` I have read the Wiki material on sources. For a biographical sketch there are essentially two kind of sources - what other people have said about her and what she has written. Those are the sources used here, nothing else is used and none of it from other copyrighted sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmandler (talk • contribs) 13:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

But look at your name. "Gmandler"? If you're not related to her, it at least might suggest a single-purpose account. It might help to read WP:U. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 19:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic