Talk:January 2

Latest comment: 2 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
This box: viewtalkedit
Selected anniversaries for the "On this day" section of the Main Page
Please read the selected anniversaries guidelines before editing this box.

January 2: Feast day of Saint Gregory of Nazianzus and Saint Basil of Caesarea (Roman Rite Catholicism, Anglicanism)

Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan
More anniversaries:

January 2

edit

Could you give reason for the removal of my edit to this date page? If there is none, please replace my edit so I don't have to.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslightell (talkcontribs) 18:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The event about the new Massachusetts law regarding marijuana was removed because it is not a globally notable event. Additionally, the event was not supported in a linked article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
The event about the new Massachusetts law is indeed a globally notable event in the worldwide initiative toward the end of cultural stigmatization of cannabis. Furthermore, several events listed on this very date page -- and I can only imagine several others -- are "not supported by a linked article." Interestingly enough, had you taken the time to fully puruse the article for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, this event is, indeed, mentioned. ACCORDINGLY, I invite you to remove every other event "not supported by a linked article" on the January 2 page by midnight tonight, elsewise I will be re-posting my edit. FURTHERMORE if you are this concerned about such minor additions, perhaps you would be well advised to check every event for all 365 days of the year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslightell (talkcontribs) 22:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm sure that you understand that it is very difficult to patrol every entry in the date articles and the newest entries get attention first, but I can assure you that the number of unsupported events is very small (perhaps one or two per page on average). I, personally, put a lot of effort into removing any entry that is not supported by a linked article and I can only speak for myself. I know that there are many other editors that do the same. You are correct that the event was supported in the linked article and that reason for removal was incorrect on my part (that wasn't the reason I removed it, but when you commented on my talk page, I remembered incorrectly). The lack of notability still stands. No one in India or the UK cares if a small state in the United States passes a law about marijuana and even if they did, it wouldn't still be notable in 20 years. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 15:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sure, sure. Your claim of lack of notability cannot be supported by any fact, however. My claim that it is indeed notable, however, is easily supported by not only nationwide media attention to this measure, but also remarks regarding it by several international news organizations. I need not enumerate here, but just do a Google News search. Apparently you will be amazed by just how notable it is.
It's indeed a great service you do for, essentially, all knowledge-loving persons of the world by facilitating the placement of accurate information in an easily accessible format, for free, on the web -- which is, if I am not mistaken the goal of the WikiMedia Foundation. Bearing this in mind, would it not be doing everyone you so conscientiously serve a great disservice by not erring on the side of too much information?
Just a thought. You obviously are more familiar with editting Wikipedia than I, so I'll leave the decision up to you, while respectfully disagreeing with your present one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslightell (talkcontribs) 19:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jett Travolta

edit

Why Not Jett Travolta? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.146.26.165 (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jett Travolta is not the subject of his own Wikipedia article. That is the minimum notability requirement for inclusion in the list. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Second New Year (South Africa)

edit

The Cape Coloreds Tweede Nuwe Jaar I think belongs on this page. cape-town-new-years-carnival Slaves holiday Salsa New Year Wizzy 08:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Twelve Days of Christmas

edit

Hey Jerk,

What are you? Some kind of sadist? Today it's nine pipers piping! All they really want to do is chase the maids. The cows are upset and are stepping on those screeching birds. What am I going to do? The neighbors have started eviction proceedings against me.

You'll get yours.

Agnes

70.89.177.161 (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Births and Deaths

edit

Continuing the ongoing effort to reduce the size of the Births and Deaths sections to make them manageable, I'm removing some celebrities with few or no articles in other wikipedias, moving the entries to the appropriate Year in Topic article if they were not already present. This is in accordance with the guidelines. See discussions at Wikipedia_talk:Days_of_the_year.Deb (talk) 08:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

A mention should be made that US Goverment Offices Mail etc.Closed Jan 2nd

edit

Seems that when Jan.2nd(i.e.Jan.2nd,2017) Falls on a Sunday the next day Jan.2nd is a US Fedeal Giverment Holiday! Thanks!Eddson storms (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


Holidays and observances

edit

The article states that 2 January is a holiday in Alsace (as well as in Switzerland and Liechtenstein). I am looking for a good source of information about this reference to Alsace. 2007AmazeImport (talk) 09:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sounds to me like Berchtoldstag is a very informal celebration. We should consider removing it. Deb (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
It is definitely a public holiday in most of Switzerland. Busses run a Sunday service for example. Banks and post offices are closed and the processing of transactions is delayed until the next working day, - so it is formal here. I can't speak for Liechtenstein or in particular Alsace however, hence my query. 2007AmazeImport (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps I had better remove Alsace until a reference can be found. Deb (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


1991

edit

At the time she took the oath of office as Mayor of Washington, D.C. Her name was Sharon Pratt Dixon.

[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.40.239 (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Czech

edit

please change ((Czech)) to ((Czechs|Czech)) 2601:541:4580:8500:7882:3905:8517:22CF (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Done Volteer1 (talk) 16:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 February 2022

edit

January 2January 2nd – Same with my other ones on the dates. Jishiboka1 (talk) 02:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Discussion moved to Talk:January 1#Requested move 22 February 2022. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:January 1 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply