Talk:James Griffith
Latest comment: 5 years ago by StraussInTheHouse in topic Requested move 4 March 2019
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
edittrain to Laramie 1954 with john payne, dan Duryea. he played town marshall, credited — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.18.244 (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 4 March 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved: consensus appears to be that the actor is the primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 11:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
– No indication that this prolific character actor, whose final acting role was in 1984, has had sufficient prominence to qualify as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC among the dab page's four entries. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 10:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support per WP:NOPRIMARY - since its not clear the actor is the primary topic, the dab page should be at the base --DannyS712 (talk) 06:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. The actor appears to be the sole James Griffith who gets any sort of pageviews at all, so a move strikes me as unnecessary. Nohomersryan (talk) 07:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Actor is primary topic for page views and long-term significance. I also note that the trend in page views is going up over time - a quite unexpected result. -- Netoholic @ 11:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Netoholic, no significant interest in any other James Griffith so the actor looks like a good primary topic to me. PC78 (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose for reasons delineated in above "opposed" votes.Monkeyzpop (talk) 06:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support – too obscure to be primary. Disambiguation serves readers better. Dicklyon (talk) 03:39, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. I do not think this should be redone. He is primary topic per interest. --Quiz shows 19:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.