Talk:Jade Barbosa

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reference for popularity

edit

In trying to fix one of the [citation needed] tags toward the end of the article, I went looking for something to document her popularity. Best I found so far was this from a blog on Globo's site:

Jogos de Pequim aumentam audiência da Globo: Jade Barbosa, Daiane dos Santos e companhia renderam à Globo 20 pontos, com 49% de share. No mesmo horário, com a programação normal, a audiência fica em torno dos 14 pontos.

[1] accessed today - but the permalink tries to make me register: [2].

Anyway, if the network broadcasting the games in Brazil cites her first as the reason why they're doing well, that seems significant. - PhilipR (talk) 15:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jade Barbosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply