Talk:Jaana Na Dil Se Door

Protection request

Jaana Na Dil Se Door

• Jaana Na Dil Se Door (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ABCDE22 (talk) 06:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Comment:- This page is being repeatedly vandalized by IP which is violating article's WP:NEUTRALITY and also talk page discussion. Plz give the article give protection.ABCDE22 (talk) 06:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Mm

Hey actor shashank vyas from balika vadhu is also acting in this show...I missed his name..in cast members Sivasai06 (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

This is only one of the really trite and inane soaps/serials that are shown on TV channels in India and other countries. Some of the situations are so unbelievable as to knock out the discerning viewers' mind. The most famous of these shows is Saath Nibhana Sathiya shown on the same channel. I wonder how producers and production houses bother to waste their money on such shows? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abul Bakhtiar (talk • contribs) 04:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Cast of the serial

According to many various source Vikram Singh Chuhan and Shivani Surve was the main lead. But many anonymous user is editing article in their own way. I hope some clearity come about this point. PKSD (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

The source support this arguement are:

• http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/Shashank-Vyas-finally-enters-Jaana-Na-Dil-Se-Door/articleshow/53139953.cms
• http://www.filmibeat.com/television/news/2017/jana-na-dil-se-door-takes-a-leap-again-finally-atharv-vividha-to-get-married-257890.html
• http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/shashank-vyas-to-romance-sara-khan-on-jaana-na-dil-se-door/
• http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/jaana-na-dil-se-door-to-go-off-air-by-june-end/
• — Preceding unsigned comment added by PKSD (talk • contribs) 13:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

I also agree with you. I think the page should be protected from anonymous user.ABCDE22 (talk) ABCDE22 (talk) 09:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Looking at the given references I can verify so. We are neutral at Wikipedia and we present the facts not fan-made content. I will nominate the page to be locked or redirect it if these vandalism continues on.JayB91 (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Then do so JayB91.ABCDE22 (talk) 12:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Puffery

To say that the story is "powerful", as is done in this edit is to make a value judgement or evaluation in Wikipedia's voice. If a critic says that the story is powerful, the critic can be quoted. But a Wikipedia editor must not say so. That is puffery. I see that another editor has already reverted this. Please do not reinsert it, PKSD. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 06:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry DESiegel for my mistake. I must did it mistakenly during undoing some anonymous edit. Even I don't know when I did it. PKSD (talk)

Not a major problem PKSD, as long as you understand the principle. FYI, you did it at 00:52, 23 July 2017 (Eastern time, i think) in an "undo" of my edit that removed only that one word. See the link above. Please be careful with UNDOs and other forms of reversion. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 06:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Protection request

I think the page should be locked from anonymous user.ABCDE22 (talk) ABCDE22 (talk) 09:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Not done: The page is already semi-protected which prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has at least ten edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed. Anyway requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 10:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

"POV" plot

You've removed plot content here, here, here and here, and at no point have you opened a discussion on this talk page to discuss your removals. In some cases[1][ you've failed to provide any explanation whatsoever for your removal of the content, but in some cases the explanations you've provided have been vague like "Stop giving your POV in wikipedia", "Stop giving fan based written update", "Complete POV". So, I'm challenging you to please provide a clear argument for why this content is either "POV", or "fan based", as I don't see huge problems with the content in these areas. To me, it looks like you're casually throwing out buzzwords that sound like you have expertise in Wikipedia guidelines and policies, when you actually do not. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

"Ye maaya chesave serial" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ye maaya chesave serial. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 20#Ye maaya chesave serial until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)