Talk:J. T. Edson
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Pincrete in topic RfC about the section "Female fight fetish"
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Missing Bibliography
editI am inquiring what has happened to the list of books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.241.52 (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- This has been restored. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
RfC about the section "Female fight fetish"
editI feel that the "Female fight fetish" section is a violation of Wikipedia:No original research. It doesn't cite any sources, and it seems to be implying that J. T. Edson was a sexual pervert or something. 192.107.137.243 (talk) 21:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Please see WP:RFC. This isn't a proper RfC because (1) there have been no previous discussion attempts about the content and (2) the RfC lacks a neutral statement/question. That said, I agree that the section on female fights is unsourced analysis and WP:OR, and the section heading is non-neutral. The content should not be restored without a reliable source that supports the claims. Schazjmd (talk) 14:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment (Summoned by bot) Agree with others about the 'fetish' section. Some of the material that remains, including "JT's political beliefs" in 1980s and some plot summaries seem similarly WP:OR and over-heated.Pincrete (talk) 08:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)