Talk:J. R. O'Dwyer Company

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

O'Dwyer rankings

edit

This article, while mentioning the O'Dwyer rankings, makes no mention of the controversy in the industry about them. There are accusations that this is not a ranking of any substance and is, instead, essentially, a pay for play scheme. Gawker referred to O'Dwyer's rankings as extortion. One of the largest agencies, Waggener Edstrom, refused to pay one year and were threatened and harassed by O'Dwyer. O'Dwyer continues the practice to this day as reported by insider blog prnewser, a publication of MediaBistro. O'Dwyer refuses to include any entity in this "ranking" that does not first provide a payment. There are questions as to whether this is in accordance with journalistic standards.Grammarphobe (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

O'Dwyer's stories about Wikipedia

edit

O'Dwyer's has reported so much about Wikipedia that they have a category for recent articles on the topic: See here. Wbm1058 (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on J. R. O'Dwyer Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply