Talk:Italian cruiser Nino Bixio

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Nino Bixio/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	suggest a note to explain calibre (ie L/50) Added - you'd think after doing enough of these I'd remember to do them ahead of time ;) suggest a display title template be used to italicise the ship name in the article title Fixed suggest the namesake be added, Nino Bixio a protege of Garibaldi Good idea
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	destroyer is overlinked Fixed not sure why the power output isn't in the infobox, just for consistency with other ship articles, really Apparently I forgot to include it suggest linking Albania during World War I rather than just Albania Hmm, that seems a little WP:EGGy given the context Not a biggie, I kind of get your point. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	ok
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	ok
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	ok
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No images
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No images
	7. Overall assessment.	Placing on hold for seven days for comments to be addressed Passing, well done.

Ref to use

Here on the action in December. Parsecboy (talk) 10:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Trials info. Parsecboy (talk) 10:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Photo (of low quality) here. Parsecboy (talk) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)