Talk:Isotopes of rhenium

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 14.52.231.91 in topic Possible alpha decay of 185Re

Half-life of OO75Rh180 Rhenium

edit

The half-life of OO75Rh180 is low in comparison to the stability trend line through its immediate OO neighbors, with OO75Rh182 being 17.7 hours, OO75Rh180 reported as 2.45 minutes, and OO75Rh178 as 13.2 minutes, which distorts the OO stability trend line profile for this element.WFPM (talk) 00:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of rhenium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Possible alpha decay of 185Re

edit

According to [1], 185Re should have an alpha decay half-life at the order of 1024 years. Adding one more proton would reduce alpha stability by nine orders of magnitude. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 20:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Considering that this is the same order as 128Te, perhaps rhenium has a good chance to be the next primordial radioactive element that all the pedants will mention after bismuth. (Not sure how long it would take to find that out, though.) Double sharp (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well I have made a calculation error: the geometric mean of the three values in the table should actually be at the order of 1025 years. 129.104.65.7 (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

128Te is a special case, not from direct measurement but geochronology. I believe from measurement by mass spectrometry of excess (stable) Xe-128 (to which Te-128 it has decayed by double beta decay) in rocks containing Te-128. It's a sort of Te/Xe dating, but using the date of the rock found by other means to inversely measure the half life of the Te-128 in it. It half-life still dispute some source list at 2.2x1024 years but some list at 7.7x1024 yearsCristiano Toàn (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cristiano Toàn (talk) 10:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC) might be measured by geochemistry method as Rhenium is siderophile element while tantalum is Litriophile elementReply
After all, EC of 123Te, many double beta decays, and alpha decays of these nuclides (from shortest to longest: 187Os, 149Sm, 176Hf, 177Hf, 145Nd, 192Pt, 178Hf) still have theoretical half-lives shorter than half-life of 128Te. 14.52.231.91 (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
It seems that there are many double beta decays (double beta minus or plus) that have half-lives between 1021 years and 1023 years. 14.52.231.91 (talk) 07:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Possible alpha decay of 183Re

edit

183Re has slightly lower alpha-decay energy than 185Re (2.12 MeV vs 2.19 MeV), so its alpha-decay half-life should be at the order of 1025 years. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply