Talk:Isai Vellalar
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Isai Vellalar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Devadasi is a practice only ?
editDevadasi is a practice only...not all isai vellalar woman's follow that system...raja rajan daughter also devadasi in thanjavur temple...so dont portray negative to public... Vignesh.k018 (talk) 23:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomads
editEarly period all community people are "nomads".example nagarathar community..isai vellalar work to service the temple..so they lived in around temple places...so nomads is a big word...u have to remove that.i belong to isai vellalar.. Vignesh.k018 (talk) 00:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Many big words are used in wiki..I should not acceptable..no one have to rights to criticize any caste in public forum
Vignesh.k018 (talk) 00:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Change isai vellalar to isai velalar
editVelalar not vellalar. Correct the spelling mistake. Harishpranovhk (talk) 19:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Vellalar background
editMost Isaivellalar are from vellallar background mention that 2409:408D:EB5:1BB9:9210:7776:39DC:26E9 (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
From which subsect
editIf isaivellalar are from vellallar guild ,what might be their subsect before working for temples for example saiva ,karkathar,sozhiyar,veerakodiyar,anybody knows our root?.edgar Thurston says vellalars and kaikolars makes isaivellalar caste and many inscription says vellalars of males and females convert themself as devaradiyar because of downfall from agriculture and some of them went without any external factors they let themself as devaradiyar to serve the god as their main duty in 1000-1200AD.but after that our present isaivellars doesnt knows their vellalar background.Some pests from our society say isaivellalars are telungus and many of us doesnt says a word against that propaganda.a only video saying that melakkaras have tamil ancestry and says with half correct history(sethirayar).karunanidhi haters says his caste name is chinnamelam but chinnamelam is not a caste ,a group of males and females with dancing and orchestra called as chinnamelam.This proves that they doesn't know the history of tamilans.nayee bhramin is the name of telugu melakkarar.16th century in tamilnadu,we can see some of our devaradiyars are misleaded and they diverted from their route first time. we cannot find which vellalar subsect they are from.for example nanchilnad vellalars in kerala some of them let themselves as devaradiyars(edgar Thurston says).some of the devaradiyar offspring uses title of mudhali as they have vellalar background.please make a video or add proof about this all contents if anyone have proofs about our vellalar background and our subsect of vellalar please add it.we cannot be a isaivellalars or melakkarars for centuries we are recently identified community we cannot be a melakkars for 1000 s of years we must have other caste backgrounds(vellalar,kaikolar,maruthuvar).if we failed to prove that society will believe developed stories.you can say 1000s of years we have devaradiyar background, even shatriyas iyers converted to devaradiyars.now the society have isaivellalars only as devaradiyars.which vellalar subsect are we? 2409:408D:330A:E180:8E9D:30AE:A459:BEAC (talk) 09:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)