Talk:Is There Anybody Out There? The Wall Live 1980–81

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Vocals on Run Like Hell

edit

Who answers David Gilmour's vocals on Run Like Hell? Andy Bown? David.Monniaux 16:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Roger Waters. On the studio version Waters sings all lead vocals on Run Like Hell. Floyd(Norway) 14:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Well, it does not sound like Waters' voice, but like a younger, different voice. Maybe I'm wrong. David.Monniaux 16:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
You are, trust me. --63.25.239.112 16:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Synthized Voice Files, I Think. "Scooter"

In The Flesh

edit

Do they play this song with a faster rythm than on the "The Wall" album? It sounds like the song goes a bit faster... I`m not sure.

I hear it faster, too. Somebody should time them. I would totally do it, but I only have the studio album on cassette, so that's not accurate. --63.25.239.112 16:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

In the flesh

edit

"The album artwork featured the life-masks of the four members of Pink Floyd at the time, which were worn by the "surrogate band" during the song "In the Flesh"."

I have seen "In the Flesh" refer to both the song and the tour on this page. Can someone clarify? Were these masked worn by others during the wall performance w/ Pink Floyd, or on Roger Waters' tour? --Daniel Olsen 21:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

it says "the song 'In the Flesh,'" which means the song during the pink floyd show, not the roger waters tour. --Progjunky 05:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pre-recorded backing tracks.

edit

Is it worth listing the songs which include pre-recorded backing tracks? Many of them do. "Bring The Boys Back Home" is essentially Roger Waters singing along to the record (you can even hear his studio vocals near the end, when the live Roger ends his last note earlier than the recorded vocal.) Any song that features orchestra uses pre-recorded backing tracks. --63.25.239.112 16:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rick Wright

edit

It seems like it's some disagreements about if Rick Wright should be credited as a part of Pink Floyd or not. In my opinion he should be listed with Gilmour, Waters and Mason but I understand why some of you disagree. He was payed as a session musician, but on the other hand he was a part of the "Pink Floyd" in the stage show and not the stage show. In the the book "Comfortably Numb - A History of "The Wall" - Pink Floyd 1978-1981" Wright is quoted saying: "...I made the decision (...) to leave. But I also made the decision to I'm going to finish the recording this album and I want to be in the live shows and then we'll say goodbye." I'll have to admit that I haven't the original CD booklet for this album here, and I can't remember what it says. The album cover shows four faces which represents the four members of the band, but I'm not sure if that's an argument. Floyd(Norway) 03:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've found the original CD sleeve for this album and Rick Wright is mentioned as part of Pink Floyd. That's why I've reverted the last edit. I think we should follow what the albums says, but if the article was about the tour and not the album, it could have been otherwise. Floyd(Norway) 22:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Here is a link http://pinkfloyd-co.com/disco/itaot/html/itaot09.html Floyd(Norway) 22:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Limited Edition

edit

Would it be worth mentioning the deluxe limited edition version of this album? I own it. It comes in a hard cardboard sleeve with a pullout hardback book (the CDs are in the front and back cover) and the book is filled with technical information about the stage set up with "engineer" type diagrams of the stage. There's also info on the before and (i think, i'll need to get it out it's been a while) after show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.172.131 (talk) 04:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sure, go ahead. I'm surprised it isn't already mentioned. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 15:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Content in track listing

edit

Sorry to revert info added by an IP regarding performance date of each track. I have no objection to this info being included, but: (a) the edits completely ignore Wikipedia's date format; (b) the notes about tracks having different titles on some editions has been removed AGAIN - in the past I've asked why this is being done, and received no reply, so I'm reverting that again; (c) moving track by track composer details to the top of the section, just to make room for the dates, is contrary to formatting policy, especially when wikilinks are removed - since this section is not template formatted, there should be no problems with showing all info for each track on its line. The editor making these changes appears to have a changing IP address, so I am posting here instead on one of his user talk pages. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 12:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

References for recording dates

edit

Will someone add references for the dates in the track list? If not, these dates have to be removed.Are1981 (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

iTunes

edit

Does the last line of the main article, "This is no longer available on iTunes" , really need to be there? What relevance does that have to the rest of the article? It's no different than saying "Walmart no longer carries the CD". It's simply not relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.208.235 (talk) 14:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Source of each track's performances

edit

PLEASE forgive me if I am in the wrong place for this. I really did look at Guidelines and remain unclear on this.


I crave any detail about this album and have long wondered about the date(s) of each track's source performance(s).

I don't question whoever provided this information in the existing article, but would love to know where the information came from. I am certainly grateful for the info, I hope/assume it's accurate and was fascinated to see that there are so many composite performances. That explains "Digital Masonry" in the credits.

Please let me know if there is a better place or way to ask this kind of thing in the future.

Thank you. Yeswab57 (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Is There Anybody Out There? The Wall Live 1980–81. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Is There Anybody Out There? The Wall Live 1980–81. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply