Talk:Irssi

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Cleanup

edit

I've cleaned up the article somewhat. I hope it's still useful. Some of the comparisons with other IRC clients seemed a bit biased, based on personal opinion and not really verifiable, so I've removed those parts. --ozzmosis 15:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I removed the section about the backdoor from the article because it didn't seem important enough to have its own section. I still left a link to the relevant page at the bottom of the article. I also fixed some random grammatical stuff, and broke the links section into categories, since it was getting kind of long. I also cleaned up this talk page. --Rhythmthing 03:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Name Origin

edit

The edit that removed this just caught my eye:

The name "Irssi" comes from Finnish internet slang meaning "IRC", and should be pronounced "ihr-see".

Nowadays when Irssi is well enough known, irssi means only the client. Back when Irssi didn't yet exist, Finnish people sometimes called IRC "irssi". Like normally ircci -> irkki, but since "c" can in some words be also pronounced as "s", some people thought it's funny or whatever to call ircci -> irssi. Anyway, since nowadays I don't think anyone calls IRC irssi anymore (since it'd just be ambiguous), the sentence could use a little editing if it's ever added back.. --Irssi's original author — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.65.172 (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

This may be the case, but surely derivative terms such as irssata 'to chat on IRC' are still, at least in my experience, platform or client independent concepts. --Zet (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

In finnish most of the words are pronounced as they're written. It's pronounced just as "irssi" not "ihr-see"- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tusina (talkcontribs) 18:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

I redirected MacIrssi to Irssi, because though it is rather too unknown for a whole article, a redirect would be more efficient. [wossi] 21:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Clarification Request

edit

The section about running irssi in windows is unclear. The section in parentheses can be read as affecting either the windows-native install, the cygwin install, or both. Which is it? Please make that part more clear, and break it out of the parentheses. MrZaiustalk 04:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Rhythmthing 03:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have removed the logo since it is a red link. [wossi] 21:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I reinserted the logo...maybe it's about time? Rhythmthing 03:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation in IPA?

edit

I've listened to the official pronunciation, and it appears to be [ˈirsi], or perhaps [ˈirssi], with an actual [r], not an [ɹ]. Can anyone verify? --Ihope127 (talk) 20:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Improve References

edit

At present there is a lack of references in the article. The topic is clearly notable and references that appear in reliable third-party publications can be easily found using the news search:

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Please help develop this article. Thanks. --Hm2k (talk) 12:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

notability?

edit

Irssi not notable? Apparently being distributed with nearly every FOSS os distribution available is not sufficient... BlanchardJ (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Shame neither WP:NSOFT got accepted. But anyway, no--FOSS distros tend to contain whatever contributors (any random third-party user or developer) feels like packaging and submitting. I'm not aware of any major distro that accepts/rejects contributions based on anything more than quality of the packaging (i.e., it's not a reliable source for anything about the underlying software). That is, we're stuck using WP:GNG, and inclusion in a distro seems to me like trivial coverage (product listing, not significant). DMacks (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the reply, that was meant as a somewhat sarcastic comment about the notability challenge of a wildly used software. I think that the Refimprove banner would be sufficient in this case. I was not aware of the failed guideline proposal however, there is some interesting material in both of them sadly. BlanchardJ (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. I love irssi! DMacks (talk) 21:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Windows

edit

I don't see a download for Windows on the downloads page. It appears to have been removed since the time it was archived. Benjamin (talk) 04:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irssi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply