Talk:Ireland cricket team

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Queen of Hearts in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleIreland cricket team was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You KnowIn the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 3, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 1, 2005.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Irish cricket team didn't become an official member of the International Cricket Council until 1993, despite having played first-class cricket matches since 1902, including games against Scotland, Australia and New Zealand?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on June 22, 2017.
Current status: Delisted good article

Big gap?

edit

There does seem to be little information included here about the Irish team for much of the 20th century. I have my theories why, but it would be nice to have more information on it. I'll have a look at some works on cricket in Ireland and might add something. Ceaceacea (talk) 21:41, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

edit

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There is uncited text, particularily in the "Team colours" section
  • The lead is quite long for an article of this size. Can this be shortened to a couple of paragraphs?

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. charlotte 👸♥ 01:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is uncited text, particularly in the "Team colours" section. The lead is quite long for an article of this size, and should probably be shortened to a couple of paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 01:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.