Talk:Introduction to entropy
Latest comment: 3 years ago by PAR in topic cards on the table
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Introduction to entropy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
cards on the table
edit(Discussion deleted and continued on User_talk:PAR)
It seems to me that none of this material by Chjoaygame is relevant for this article, which is an "Introduction to .." article. Some of it may be relevant to Entropy, but I am not even clear about that. This article should be understood by someone who has just been introduced to the topic of entropy. Chjoaygame, please stop wasting our time reading through your long edits to see if anything is relevant to this article. --Bduke (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am just as guilty for running down this rabbit hole with Chjoaygame. I agree, it has no place on this talk page, and I have removed it to my talk page. Chjoaygame and I have had many arguments in the past, and yes, he tends to say in two complicated paragraphs what he could say in one sentence. In his defense, he will actually engage in an argument, rather than ignoring what you say and repeating the same POV over and over again. He will adjust his understanding as need be and does not engage in ad-hominem attacks. This is rare, and I try to do the same. The discussion actually does derive from a disagreement about the wording of the introduction, and if we reach a consensus of two on my talk page, offer any conclusions here. PAR (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)