Talk:Interstate 805
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Imzadi1979 in topic Why is this road marked Interstate 805 and not Interstate 508?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interstate 805 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Interstate 805 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 18, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of the Mission Valley Viaduct mentioned extensively in the article be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in California may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Why is this road marked Interstate 805 and not Interstate 508?
editNothing is mentioned about this idea in the text.
As I-5 is a north and south road and not east and west road. It seems more logical to make the present I-805, which is a north and south detour or alternate to I-5 to have a number that reflected the relationship between the I-805 and I-5 rather than to the I-8. That would make the present I-805 into I-508 or I-50X. I-8 has no other related 3 digit branches anywhere along it's length so there would be no conflict if there were spurs, bypasses, connectors, etc. on the existing I-8. Has anyone ever came up with an explanation for this anomaly? Michou 13 (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nothing is mentioned about it in the text because we'd need a source for the idea that some other number was considered.
- Since I-805 begins and ends at I-5, so it functions as a bypass for I-5, it was numbered as an auxiliary of I-5. There's nothing anomalous about this situation at all. Imzadi 1979 → 20:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)