Talk:Interstate 25 in Colorado/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ---Dough4872 02:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The route description seems very dry and repetitive, I-25 is used in almost every sentence. In addition, there are WP:MOSBOLD violations throughout the prose and many short one-sentence paragraphs.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- There are large areas of uncited information throughout the article.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Some more information could be added to the article.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Right now, the article appears to have major issues regarding the prose and sourcing, these issues should be addressed before taking the article GAN. Therefore, I will have to fail the article. The article may be renominated when these issues are taken care of. ---Dough4872 02:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)