Talk:Intensional logic

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.

Philosophy: Logic / Analytic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Analytic philosophy

What intensional logic is

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Intensional logic is not a family of non-truth-functional logics. It is logic that treats both sense and reference of expressions. The whole article, while nicely enough written, goes off at the wrong tangent. Some can be salvaged, but the surgery will be savage. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I beg to differ! The article is not nicely written. A lot of it seems to be written by someone with a poor command of English. 86.155.1.106 (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Poor English

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This:

The semantical motivations were explained expressively, of course without those tools that we know in establishing semantics for modal logic in a formal way...

needs to be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.217.237 (talk) 12:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic