Talk:Information asymmetry/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
neo-classical economics which assumes perfect information
LOL! Someone really doesn't understand either classical or neo-classical economics 178.148.80.200 (talk) 23:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
imperfect information in game theory
Is there any relevance to imperfect information games as part of overall game theory here? Cowbert (talk) 04:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Contradiction
Near the beginning, the article states that buyers of life insurance know more than sellers. Near the end, it list life insurance as a case where sellers know more. I'm pretty sure the first is true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.57.220.248 (talk) 16:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Grammar problem resulting in nonsense
Someone who knows the material needs to fix this sentence in the lede: "Information asymmetries are studied in the context of principal–agent problems where they are a major cause of misinforming and is essential in every communication process." Is the verb "is" missing a proper subject(since the singular verb can't agree with the plural "asymmetries" or "they"), or should the verb "is" here simply be pluralized (to "are")?