Talk:Indre Wijdefjorden National Park
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indre Wijdefjorden National Park has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 6, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Indre Wijdefjorden National Park contains the only High Arctic steppe vegetation in Europe? | |||||||||
Photos
editA pity it doesn't have any photographs. Maybe request some from flickr if they exist?Dr. Blofeld 17:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've checked Flickr, and there is nothing there (although it may be located under a cryptic description). This is among the most remote places on earth and very few of the cruise ships to Svalbard go in the area, so it is difficult to find images. Arsenikk (talk) 17:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Indre Wijdefjorden National Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- '
'a unique plant-geographic exclusive vegetation Can this be clarified, it doesn't seem clear to me.Also,bird mountain vegetation.Both phrases used twice.bird mountain? What is meant by this?
- I made some minor copy-edits. I split up "fjord landscape " as this is not an English word.[1]
- '
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Assume good faith for off-line sources. As far as I can ascertain all sources are reliable.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Pity that there are no photographs, but I guess some may become available in future.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Just the two phrases which need re-writing for clarity as they don't make much senses at present. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)- OK, nesting cliffs! I am happy to pass this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I've rephrased both sentences so they are a bit more reader friendly (yes, I had to stop and think myself what they actually meant). Arsenikk (talk) 10:18, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- We still need an explanation of "bird mountain". What do you mean by this? Jezhotwells (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, trying to do direct translations here (not always as successful). Changed to 'nesting cliff', which was in my Norwegian–English dictionary. Arsenikk (talk) 13:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- We still need an explanation of "bird mountain". What do you mean by this? Jezhotwells (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)