Talk:Indigenous peoples of the Philippines
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This page was megred with the page Indigenous Peoples from the Philippines Nasugbu batangas (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indigenous peoples of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090428144026/http://www.philippines.hvu.nl/mindanao2.htm to http://www.philippines.hvu.nl/mindanao2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Copied content from Ancestral domain
editThe following content was copied from Ancestral domain. Will also add a note on that article's talk page. -Crisantom (talk) 07:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
In the Philippines, the term is used to refer to indigenous peoples' land rights in law.[1] Ancestral lands are referred to in the Philippines Constitution. Article XII, Section 5 says: "The State, subject to the provisions of this Constitution and national development policies and programs, shall protect the rights of indigenous cultural communities to their ancestral lands to ensure their economic, social, and cultural well-being."[2]
The Indigenous People's Rights Act of 1997 recognizes the right of Indigenous peoples to manage their ancestral domains.[3] The law defines ancestral domain to include lands, inland waters, coastal areas, and natural resources owned or occupied by Indigenous peoples, by themselves or through their ancestors.[4]
The Food and Agriculture Organization's research on forest land ownership in the Philippines found conflicts in institutional mandates among the Local Government Code, mining law and the National Integrated Protected Areas Act, and recommended exclusive resource use rights to community-based forest management communities.[5]
References
- ^ Romualdo, Arlyn; Palisoc, VCD. "Protecting IPs' Rights to Ancestral Domains and Lands". University of the Philippines. Archived from the original on 16 October 2013. Retrieved 10 October 2013.
- ^ Bernas, Joaquin. "Ancestral domain vs regalian doctrine (2)". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 10 October 2013.
- ^ "Fast Facts: Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines | UNDP in Philippines". UNDP. 2013. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
- ^ "Republic Act No. 8371". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. 29 October 1997. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
- ^ "Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements: are they contributing to better forest management and poverty reduction?" (PDF). FAO. Retrieved 10 October 2013.
Removing the section on "Reservations"
editThere is a section whose headig is "Reservations" on the article as it is written today. The section is marked unsourced. The text itself makes extraordinary claims, and in many sentence instances is editorializing in its town. I believe that it is time to remove that section, without preserving its contents. If anyone objects to this, they can simply restore the section with all the necessary WP:Reliable Sources. I will do so now. Thanks, - Batongmalake (talk) 10:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)