Talk:Inauguration of Chester A. Arthur
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic GA Review
Inauguration of Chester A. Arthur has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 6, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Inauguration of Chester A. Arthur/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 07:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Nominator: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) at 00:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
GA criteria
editGA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
editProse
editwas inaugurated the 21st President of the United States.
— my reading of MOS:JOBTITLE is that president should not be capitalized.- Done
Chief Justice of the United States Morrison Waite
— Is there a way to avoid WP:SOB- Slightly reworded to separate
Arthur was the fourth vice president to ascend to the presidency after their running mate's death
— 'running mate' is bit misleading. Better just say 'president'. Also, 'their' should be 'his'.- Done
his Cabinet
— lowercase 'c'- Done
by his citizenry
— by the citizens- Changed to "the public"
The first President of the United States
— Lowercase per MOS:JOBTITLE- Done
as Vice President for a deceased President
— same- Done and removed "of the United States" as redundant
with the Wise Resolution
— any link for that resolution?- Shockingly no! It was named for Henry A. Wise, but it feels a little Easter egg-y to link to that
Upon Zachary Taylor's 1850 death in office
— should be "Upon Zachary Taylor's death in office in 1850".- Done
while the Half-Breeds championed James G. Blaine's
— can we make it a bit more neutral?- Changed to supported
If New York's 35 electoral votes had gone to Hancock, he would have won the nomination
— Nomination or presidency?- Presidency. Changed
- Section heading:
Garfield assassination
— shouldn't it be "Garfield's assassination"- Changed
avoided traveling to Washington
— DC or state?- D.C. Changed to "the capital" (see below)
including Arthur himself
— remove 'himself'- Removed
his own assassination
— remove 'own'- Removed
Arthur had never wanted the presidency, and he saw the vice presidency as his ultimate goal.
— Did Arthur say this?- There are no direct quotes from Arthur on the matter (as he didn't give many interviews), but this is stated by both Millard and Cohen, so I added that qualification
while the stock market, always unreliable, demonstrated a downward trend.
— opinion represented as a fact. (Reliability/Unreliability is opinion; accuracy/inaccuracy is fact)- Changed to "some state of flux"; I definitely meant a different word there
- I have this on the back of my mind that Garfield's death has something to do with the doctors and Edison (maybe).
- Alexander Graham Bell, actually; he invented a metal detector that was supposed to find the bullet that the doctors couldn't, but the metal bedsprings in Garfield's bed interfered with his signal. It's hard to summarize all of the medical malpractice without going into too much detail, but I added a sentence.
- Ah, I definitely Graham Bell, but don't know why did I type Edison. Regardless, looks fine. I know the article is bit heavy on background, but it is fine. For few politics articles, background is more necessary than other articles, like this one and Cross of Gold speech! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Alexander Graham Bell, actually; he invented a metal detector that was supposed to find the bullet that the doctors couldn't, but the metal bedsprings in Garfield's bed interfered with his signal. It's hard to summarize all of the medical malpractice without going into too much detail, but I added a sentence.
Arthur survived his travel
— obviously. Do we need to mention?- I added that to clarify that he called an in-person special session later, without use of the letter. Tried to rephrase.
- We have both
Washington, D. C.
andWashington, D.C.
(with and without space)- Standardized to without space, which is what our article on the topic uses.
- I'll suggest that wherever you have to mention Washington, D.C., but avoid repetition, better state "D.C." than "Washington".
- Given that Washington did not become a state until eight years after Arthur's inauguration, and that many of the primary and secondary sources covering this period just use "Washington", I don't think that there will be any confusion if "Washington" is used.
before Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Morrison Waite
— Suggesting not to repeat 'United States' and even 'Supreme Court'- Done.
who fell to Grover Cleveland in
— lost?- Changed
1884 United States presidential election
— I'd remove 'United States'- Removed
Images
edit- You can add a few more images, like Garfield's or those 2 justice's portraits. If you like, I have also just uploaded File:Coverage of the death of James A. Garfield in 'Harrisburg Telegraph'.jpg, specifically with the letter the cabinet write Arthur. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Added the image you suggested, a political cartoon of Guiteau, and a contemporary photo of the Lexington Avenue house.
- Looks good! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Added the image you suggested, a political cartoon of Guiteau, and a contemporary photo of the Lexington Avenue house.
References
edit- Ref#81: Stathis 1979, p. 211. Harv error: link from CITEREFStathis1979 doesn't point to any citation. Harv error: this link doesn't point to any citation.
- Stathis, Schlup, it gets confusing. Fixed!
- Rest all good!
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Kavyansh.Singh I was going to give this a once-over in the morning to see if I made any silly errors, but looks like you beat me to it! Everything should be addressed, thank you for your prompt review. — GhostRiver 15:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- All my concerns are addressed, happy to promote. And please do let me know if you have any other article you want me to review! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)