Talk:Imperial Porcelain Factory, Saint Petersburg

Photos

There are photos at Wikipedia Commons. [1] ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Imperial Porcelain Factory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927000618/http://www.russian-gifts-home.com/porcelain/lomonosov_porcelain.htm to http://www.russian-gifts-home.com/porcelain/lomonosov_porcelain.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929100912/http://www.russianamericancompany.com/Info.asp?cid=24&sid=25&pid=-1&page=8&wrd=&pageName=lomonosovporcelain.htm to http://www.russianamericancompany.com/Info.asp?cid=24&sid=25&pid=-1&page=8&wrd=&pageName=lomonosovporcelain.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070506164956/http://www.ipm.ru/runewsarchive2005 to http://www.ipm.ru/runewsarchive2005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 28 September 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Kraose (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

---

Imperial Porcelain Factory → Imperial Porcelain Factory, Saint Petersburg – Ambiguity with the other "Imperial Porcelain Factories" in China and Austria has caused problems. The Commons category by this name contained both St P & Viennese wares until yesterday! Book ghits for Vienna, and China are well over half the total with no place specified. Arguably the Chinese imperial operation is the best known in the Anglosphere, and the Russian factory has had various other names at periods. "Imperial Porcelain Factory" should be set up as a disam page. Strictly speaking, the modern name in English is "Imperial Porcelain Manufactory" - also ambiguous with Vienna (so moving to that doesn't help), and the redirect needs to go the disam also. Johnbod (talk) 14:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

• Support. All three names are translations into English of enterprises little-known in the Anglosphere. There is and have been more than one empire. No WP:PTOPIC, a DAB page is the way to go to minimise confusion and to ensure that bad links get corrected. Marginal PTOPICs are guaranteed to collect bad links which are very difficult to find and to correct – unhelpful to readers, bad for the Encyclopaedia. (FWIW, 'Imperial Porcelain Factory' made me immediately think of Vienna not Petersburg – which is another argument for no PTOPIC.) Narky Blert (talk) 06:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
  • "The word imperial made me immediately think of Vienna not Petersburg". It's your problem, mate. We can't name pages on such flimsy grounds. --Ghirla^-трёп- 06:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

'"The word imperial made me immediately think of Vienna not Petersburg". It's your problem, mate.' Thank you for your thoughtful well-reasoned WP:POLICY-based contribution, which didn't address my point at all. Narky Blert (talk) 03:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

• Support This is a sensible proposal. Vexations (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
• Oppose. "Imperial Porcelain Factory" is the official name of this enterprise. I think the "problems" have been blown out of proportion. The last link to Google Books contains 9 allusions to Russia vs. 1 allusion to China. Saint Petersburg is located 53 km from Oranienbaum/Lomonosov, so the supposed clarification is not very helpful. It's like saying that Versailles is in Paris or Potsdam is in Berlin. --Ghirla^-трёп- 06:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

They [2] give their address as 192171, Санкт-Петербург, пр. Обуховской обороны, 151. At some point they were named after a person called Lomonosov, they were not located in the town Lomonosov. Vexations (talk) 12:50, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Nonsense, Ghirla! The official name in English is "Imperial Porcelain Manufactory", as I say in the nom. What Vexations says re the location; plus the town was only renamed to Lomonosov from Oranienbaum, Russia, after the same man, in 1948, whereas the factory was named after him in 1925. From 1917-1925 it was the "State Porcelain Factory". RS very commonly use Saint Petersburg. On that gbooks result, if you discard Wikipedia, I see the first 9 results as Russia 6, China 2, Vienna 1. Even on that tiny sample 6/3 is not really a sufficient majority for a primary meaning. That even you are a tad confused about the factory's location seems an added argument in favour of the move. Johnbod (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

I stand corrected. The factory is located on the road from St. Pete to Shlisselburg, near the former Porcelain Church and the Porcelain Cemetery. Support renaming to either Saint Petersburg Porcelain Factory or Russian Imperial Porcelain Factory. It's best to avoid punctuation marks in titles. --Ghirla^-трёп- 15:04, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Neither of those are much used in RS, and there is an advantage in keeping "Imperial" at the front, for indexing and recognition. Following other porcelain factories would suggest Saint Petersburg porcelain (like Vienna porcelain and many others), but that style is not used by sources, and there was also "Gardner's factory" there (founded 1765). Johnbod (talk) 16:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

According to ru:Гарднер, Франц Яковлевич, Gardner's factory has been located in the Moscow region, in the village of Verbilki. See also c:Category:Gardner Manufactory in Verbilki. --Ghirla^-трёп- 19:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes, right. My mistake. It's usually just described as in or near Moscow in summary English sources - it seems he was specifically not allowed to set it up there. We should have an article on it. Johnbod (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sources

• Gardner's factory, 'By the Banks of the Neva': Chapters from the Lives and Careers of the ...
• propaganda wares, Soviet Salvage: Imperial Debris, Revolutionary Reuse, and Russian Constructivism

By Catherine Walworth

• 250 Years of Lomonosov Porcelain Manufacture St. Petersburg: 1744-1994

Johnbod (talk) 14:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)