Talk:Imlek a.d.

Requested move 22:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 20:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Imlek (company) → Imlek – There is nothing else called Imlek in English Wikipedia, so the disambiguation part "(company)" is not needed. Imlek already redirects here. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose a Wikipedia search shows the predominance of the previous use of "Imlek" [1] before it was changed to point to this company earlier this year. A google search [2] also does not show that the company is more prominent than the Indonesian celebration. Google Images [3] only comes up with the Indonesian version of Chinese New Years. Therefore, the previous redirect should be restored. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:53, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose: The company is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, according to quick google searches. The company does not form the majority of entries using the term. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 10:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose 300 for Imlek "new year", however a dab may be a good idea. Not sure if the Indonesian New Year still meets WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as this is Serbia's largest dairy company. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

• Comment Imlek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) only started pointing here earlier this year. For 3 years, it pointed at a different topic all together. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment I have WP:BOLDly disambiguated the target page pending the resolution of this. Either it should point to the Chinese New Years article, or this article should replace it, but in the meanwhile, a disambiguation page should sit there until it's decided. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Comment: OK. I have no problem with this arrangement with Imlek being a disambiguation page. I support that. I just thought that a situation where Imlek was redirecting to this article was odd. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
• If Imlek redirects to Chinese New Year, its use in that context should at least be mentioned there. Peter James (talk) 19:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Reference added. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Imlek a.d.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916002011/http://www.imlek.rs/en/imlek-regional-dairy to http://www.imlek.rs/en/imlek-regional-dairy
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202224032/http://www.imlek.rs/en/history to http://www.imlek.rs/en/history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)