This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've deleted this, as it's factually incorrect: "With only one exception, every scenario in Imaginative Sex assumes a one-way power exchange ... in which the male is the absolute dominant in the encounter, and the female the absolute and total submissive. The sole exception is a scenario in which the man role-plays the part of a woman and the woman role-plays the part of a man, with the (male) "woman" submitting to the dominant (female) "man". Thus, Norman has preserved the dynamic of the male dominant and female submissive even when pretending to subvert this." John Norman's scenarios are indeed heavily male-dominant, but as written the text is incorrect. Wyvern01:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's not fully explained in the article (and I'm not sure that it could be without a somewhat tangential discussion), but the modern BDSM movement didn't really come together until the 1980s, and the term "BDSM" itself doesn't seem to have been coined until 1990-1991, so Norman's 1974 book was not of course part of that... AnonMoos (talk) 09:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}