Talk:IllumiNations
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IllumiNations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about IllumiNations. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about IllumiNations at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article Created
editWell, its a start --blm07 02:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Missing Information
editAt some point in time the IllumNations version of the show (now referred to by most as Classic IllumiNations) was removed from this article. It would fall between Laserphonic Fantasy and Holiday IllumiNations. This may have been done by a editor not familiar with the show, and saw most of the music was the same as Laserphonic Fantasy. Although true, Laserphonic Fantasy had Electronic Synthesizer music, while Classic IllumiNations had all Symphonic Music. They were completely different shows. I think I have this information on file still somewhere, I will look for it to make changes but it may be a while before I can. If someone else has all the information to make corrections sooner, please do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.202.87.49 (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
beethoven symphony
editI'm just a casual user and don't know haw to edit this stuff. Under the "illuminations" section, third act, no 20, "Ode to Joy" is listed as being from Beethoven's 1st symphony when it actually from the 9th. following the links will confirm this.--24.210.217.138 08:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I've changed it, I'm not so sure if the original list was 100% correct. --blm07 10:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Why remove the infoboxes for 25 B and 98? The information is in a "show facts" section now, just what you didn't want to have in the first place. --blm07 10:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IllumiNations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927003501/http://www.wdwmagic.com/i.htm to http://www.wdwmagic.com/i.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Do we need composers listed, or can we just link the page instead?
editThe composers with their own indents and lines are adding quite a bit of bulk that may or may not be necessary. We could trim a lot of the unneeded bulk of the article by linking to the individual articles for the pieces instead. Thoughts? Armvis (talk) 15:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Armvis