Talk:Ihud

Latest comment: 14 days ago by 2A06:C701:4FC9:FD00:84B6:DC6D:E118:AF2F

The article doesn't bother to explain why the movement was a failure -- briefly, that Arab leaders in their public statements refused to consider giving Jews any status other than a minority in a unitary state without any special autonomy or entrenched protections (not to mention that many of those who had arrived after 1917 would probably not even be given citizenship in the unitary state), something which was unacceptable to the great majority of Jews. AnonMoos (talk) 20:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

You need look no further than the list of names at the top of the article. For a "bi-national" party, its membership was entirely Jewish. 2A06:C701:4FC9:FD00:84B6:DC6D:E118:AF2F (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Mapai party

edit

Was the Ihud party later known as the Mapai as asserted in the article on Rudolf Kastner https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Rudolf_Kastner#Early_career?--Brenont (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Definitely not. Mapai already existed by this point and was strongly in favor of a Jewish state. 2A06:C701:4FC9:FD00:84B6:DC6D:E118:AF2F (talk) 22:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Zionism and the Roads Not Taken 1880-1948

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 February 2023 and 11 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Notsunny9299 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: AnonVisor, Hms2026.

— Assignment last updated by Dolly City (talk) 18:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply