Talk:Ignaz Pleyel

Latest comment: 6 months ago by TooManyFingers in topic Spelling, Ignaz vs Ignace

How recent is recent?

edit

Recent scholarship has suggested that the theme for the Variations on a Theme by Joseph Haydn, by Johannes Brahms, opus 56a, was probably composed not by Haydn but by Ignaz Pleyel.

This is mentioned in Grove V, vol. IV, p. 177, (Haydn: Works, Divertimenti). My copy was reprinted in 1966, but it was actually written in 1954. I suppose that's still relatively recent compared to Pleyel's time, but just reading the sentence quoted above, I got the impression it was something that had come to light in the last 10 years or so. -- JackofOz (talk) 22:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't have any sources available for a week or so, but I am positive that I have seen much later scholarship ascribing the work to Salieri rather than Pleyel. I'll get back to it. Sirion123 (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pleyel pianos

edit

How could I add only the section (Pleyel pianos) to the category of Piano manufacturing companies, without adding the entire article into it?
Or should we have a separate article for the piano company?
--Chimin 07 (talk) 06:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think we should definitely have a separate article for the company. Other major piano companies have articles. This is a leftover from the primitive early days of Wikipedia. Thanks for noticing. Opus33 (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ignaz Pleyel/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I agree that this is a start-class article, even if a good one. With a few changes, I think it could easily be brought up to B-class. First, the lead section needs to be expanded, and secondly there should be more that can be said about this composer, who the article says was one of the most famous composer of his time. At the moment though, there are too many scattered one-sentence paragraphs and it reads like a collection of notes, rather than an article. Only a little improvement needed though, and it does have nice pictures. Carcharoth 16:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 16:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ignaz Pleyel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ignaz Pleyel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Number of siblings

edit

Various sources claim wrongly that he was the 24th of over 30 siblings which is incorrect. His father Martin Pleyel had eight children with his first wife Anna Theresia née Forster and eight more children with his second wife Maria Anna née Placho (see their birth entries in the church book of Ruppersdorf, Austria: https://data.matricula-online.eu/de/oesterreich/wien/ruppersthal/01%252C2%252C3-03/?pg=1)

First wedding of Martin Pleyel: 1. Franz (20.01.1745), 2. Joseph Thaddäus (7.3.1747), 3. Anna Theresia (15.1.1751), 4. Maria Anna (7.2.1751), 5. Maria Elisabeth (17.4.1753), 6. Johann Nepomuk (23.7.1754), 7. Maria Franziska (21.5.1756), 8. Ignatz Joseph (18.6.1757)

Second wedding of Martin Pleyel: 9. Matthias (2.12.1760), 10. Ferdinand (9.2.1763), 11. Joseph (23.2.1765), 12. Josepha (10.5.1767), 13. Cäcilia (21.1.1769), 14. Martin Joseph (12.3.1770), 15. Johann Michael (9.7.1771), 16. Aloysia (1.2.1773) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaori de Venustas (talkcontribs) 10:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Spelling, Ignaz vs Ignace

edit

Both spellings are absolutely correct and well-attested; there is no valid way to exclude either one, because both are present in large numbers of good sources. In such a case, how are article-writing decisions made? TooManyFingers (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

With very famous people, WP:COMMONNAME. With others, consensus I think. Looks like I'm the one who wrote the first draft of this article, back in 2004. "Ignaz" was the name I had learned because most of the music I have by Pleyel was published in Germany or Austria. If there's consensus to move the article to Ignace that's certainly fine with me. Antandrus (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't have an informed opinion to contribute, so I'm staying out of the discussion - other than to suggest that there might be a discussion. TooManyFingers (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply