Talk:ITromsø

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems as I see them

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was initially just going to copyedit this when I found it, but as I looked it over, I noticed two major problems. Starting with the lesser:

Citations needed. I suspect much of the material outside of the Lindberg case section is derived from the newspaper website. The one secondary source, which is currently a dead link, is cited in reference to the legal brouhaha. What this article would need is a Norwegian-speaking editor to find appropriate secondary material. However, that might be irrelevant, because...
I suspect this subject isn't notable at all. The major claim to notability seems entirely wrapped up in the Lindberg case, which already has a writeup (and a stronger writeup) at Odd F. Lindberg. There seems no secondary coverage of Bladet Tromsø specifically, which is required by my reading of WP:ORG. If that is so, then it seems to me that the best course of action is to delete and direct editing work to the other page.

While I was considering just putting it in WP:AFD, I wanted to leave the article a better place than I found it and post my thoughts for discussion before taking any precipitous action. Anyone have a reason/plan for keeping this? dkonstantinos (talk) 03:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ownership

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The newspaper was owned by Verdens Gang from 1986 to 1992. It is now published by Bladet Tromsø A/S, a subsidiary of Harstad Tidende, and is through this part of the Schibsted Group.

From what I can find, Bladet Tromsø (or iTromsø) is a part of the Harstad Tidende group, which merged with the Adresseavisen group in 2008 to form Polaris Media. source Even though Schibsted have had ownership in all these papers, they sold out of Polaris Media following the Media Norge deal. Source So I change the text to:

The newspaper was owned by Verdens Gang from 1986 to 1992. It is now published by Bladet Tromsø A/S, a subsidiary of Harstad Tidende, and is through this part of the Polaris Media, which was earlier owned by the Schibsted Group. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ITromsø. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic