Talk:INSP (TV network)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the INSP (TV network) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Talk pages on Wikipedia are not for attempting to correspond with the subject of an article. INSP does not have control over the content of this article. If you are seeking to contact INSP, do so by using the contact us form on their website. |
Merger
editI don't think this article should be merged -- INSP is a separate religious channel that is part of a larger Inpiration Networks. It would be like the CBS network being merged into CBS Corporation's article. I say leave it as it is. -- azumanga 18:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- These articles should not be merged. The Inspiration Networks is the parent company of INSP-The Inspiration Network and 3 other distinct cable networks. They are not one in the same entity. Like FOX owns Fox News Channel, FX, etc. The Inspiration Networks owns INSP, iLife-TV, INI, etc. toddbarwick 13:13 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- The parent organization has its own article: The Inspiration Networks. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- The content of this article currently doesn't differentiate it from its parent, though! Sidefall (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Apparent press release inserted verbatim on August 29 2008
editBased on its style and tone, it's obvious that these edits [1] inserted the verbatim text of a press release into the article, which I then removed. Wikipedia is not a means of advertising or promotion and articles must not be written as if they were advertisements. Further, regardless of whether or not this press release was picked up and printed by a newspaper, copyrighted sources may be used as a source of information, not of verbatim sentences. Cut-and-pasting of material from such sources is disallowed. (Applicable Wikipedia policies include WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:COPYRIGHT; "All works are copyrighted unless either they fall into the public domain or their copyright is explicitly disclaimed.") Mike Doughney (talk) 08:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, Mike. I'm confused then. Third party sources are to be used for updating a Wiki entry, but we cannot quote the third party source. If we write what the third party source writes, but don't quote, it's not accepted either. How can we add information to a Wiki entry without quoting but siting outside sources? This is very, very confusing! 208.104.34.130 (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sure you could get more detail by checking the links provided, but the gist of it is that the article should not consist of direct quotes, although it may occasionally contain direct quotes. The article should contain the same facts as are in the copyrighted source, but not the same exact words as the source. In short, the source should be cited (referenced), not copied. Does that help? ~ MD Otley (talk) 22:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Requested move 2 April 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved: There is no consensus in the discussion to move the article.(non-admin closure) Spekkios (talk) 22:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
INSP (TV network) → INSP (TV channel) – Not a network by definition; see https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Television_stations_task_force#Network,_channel,_or_station?+Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, the article itself refers to it as a network. Dr. Vogel (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'd like to ask this be withdrawn so that I can take the NCBC rewrite to RfC (which I plan to do after giving the projects affected a few days to review the full text). If I had known about this a week ago, I'd have had something to say then, too. Context: the table linked in the section is (the largest) part of my proposal to update Wikipedia:Naming conventions (broadcasting). If the topic interests anyone, let me know and I will happily ping you when the RfC is made. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)