Talk:Hyporheic zone

Untitled

Reviewers - Is this still too technical? Which bits exactly? Experts - Is this still a good representation of the facts? 131.111.16.20 (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2021 and 11 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): FreyaPortales97. Peer reviewers: Marcou320, Appletree4life.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Underflow or hyporheic flow

I added the synonym "underflow" which should be equivalent of "hyporheic flow". Although in Environmental Dictionary 2004 (http://mot.kielikone.fi/mot/endic/netmot.exe?UI=fied&height=165) it is referred as follows: "movement of water through a pervious stratum under the bed of a river. Maybe there are any nuances about it"--Bioneer1 (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Observations and suggestions for improvements

The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Tecnology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2020.

I did find the article (in the English version and in its Italian counterpart) meaningful and including appropriate referencing. I spotted a minor inconsistency (Habit instead of Habitat) and, other than this one, the use of English is appropriate. I am not entirely sure about the third picture in the gallery, as it depicts fish, whose connection with the organisms living within the hyporheic region is not entirely clear. There is a nice balance between technical and popular terminology, thus making the article accessible to a wide audience.

Majorett (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2020 (UTC)