Talk:Hurricane Sergio (2006)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Sergio (2006) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Hurricane Sergio (2006) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
GA Assessment
edit- NPOV: Pass
- Well-written: Its hink, it'll pass.
- Stability: Pass
- Images: Pass
- Refs: Pass
- Broad: Pass
- Factually Accurate: Pass
Well done on my choice. Didn't expect this much info.Mitchazenia 17:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
editAs part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after it passed in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
HURDAT
editWhen Sergio became a tropical storm on November 14, the 2006 season had the most tropical storms in the eastern Pacific Ocean since the 1994 season. It was also the first season since 1961 in which more than one tropical storm formed in November. Tropical Storm Rosa became a tropical storm about five days prior to Sergio.[1]
Sergio was the first hurricane in the Eastern Pacific during the month of November since Hurricane Octave in 2001, which formed in late October. It was also the first to form and attain hurricane status in the basin in November since Hurricane Rick in 1997.[1] The cyclone was the strongest recorded Pacific hurricane after November 1, surpassing the previous record set by Hurricane Nora in 1991, which had winds of 105 mph (170 km/h) and a pressure of 970 mbar. Sergio was the longest-lived November tropical cyclone in the eastern Pacific Ocean on record, lasting seven days; the previous record was six days by Nora in 1991.[2][1]
References
- ^ a b c Hurricane Research Division (2007). "Hurricane Data for Pacific Hurricanes 1949-2006". NOAA. Archived from the original on August 18, 2007. Retrieved 2007-02-13.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
tcrwas invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Evaluating this article
editFrom Talk:Hurricane Kristy (2006), it appears you are open for merging this article, but I'm leaning towards opposing this merge because this is a record breaker storm, ala Hurricane Epsilon (2005). @Hurricanehink: Do you really believe that this article could be sustained, and at least could be improvable into FA? SMB99thx my edits 08:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose and what about the merge momitorium? About not merging articles? I made a request at WP: AN to close the discussion. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not starting a discussion about merging this article. What I'm doing is to evaluate if this article is expandable - It's one of many points suggested in the moratorium. SMB99thx my edits! 22:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- To SMB99thx, no I don't think this article could be improved into a featured article. It only dropped 1.97 inches of rainfall, so there's little chance for flooding and other impacts that would normally beef up an article. Also, its records are rather trivial, and it being one of two November storms was tied by 2015. I removed the ACE bit, since November 2015 is higher w Sandra. HurricaneTracker495, the moratorium (which is what I believe you meant) is an agreement among editors to halt these discussions. We can wait for after the moratorium to actually implement the merge. I think it's good to look at our older articles, as sometimes they're built up with lengthy met histories (which can be summarized a bit better) and trivial records. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Procedural delist. Noah, AATalk 14:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Consensus for a merge at Talk:2006 Pacific hurricane season. Noah, AATalk 14:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)