Talk:Hurricane Juliette (2001)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Hurricane Juliette (2001) is currently an Earth sciences good article nominee. Nominated by ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) at 01:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Category 4 Pacific hurricane in 2001 |
Todo
editNeeds more on impact, and slightly longer intro. Jdorje 20:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Impact pictures, inline sources. Jdorje 19:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- I found an AMS paper talking about Juliette. It turns out that it was one of the wettest tropical cyclones in point storm total rainfall in Baja California for the past quarter century. I'll add the reference/text in the next couple days. Thegreatdr 19:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Good find. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- I found an AMS paper talking about Juliette. It turns out that it was one of the wettest tropical cyclones in point storm total rainfall in Baja California for the past quarter century. I'll add the reference/text in the next couple days. Thegreatdr 19:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Damages
editIf anyone is curious on how I found the damages, I found that Juliette caused $175 million dollars in damage in 2001, per this site. Though it says dollars, it means pesos, I asked my spanish friend (luckily enough I have one). After that, I converted $175 million pesos to USD using this monetary converter site. I wasn't sure of the date, so I chose late December. Then I inflated it to 2005 USD. If this is disallowed, I can remove it, but feel free to comment if necessary. Hurricanehink 19:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- That is okay for now, but ultimately we should use GDP deflation for the inflation calculation. — jdorje (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Did we agree on that (I forget)? The whole money thing is a little confusing, so until we change all of them, we should keep it as it is. Hurricanehink 20:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- We haven't really agreed yet. But that's how it was done in the Cuba document. I agree, until we start changing all of them, we should keep it as it is. — jdorje (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Lead section too short
editI believe that the lead section for this article is too short compared the the rest of the article. Gummycow moomilk 16:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Juliette (2001)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 01:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 01:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Hurricanehink, I'll be taking this review. It's a bit out of my wheelhouse but I'll do my best, so bear with me. Fritzmann (message me) 01:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)