Ceauşescu's children

edit

This article is a complete whitewash. Romania has one of the worst human rights records in Europe, considering their treatment of orphans, the mentally ill, and the physically challenged. A society is judged by how it treats its least fortunate, and Romania has failed the test. Viriditas (talk) 06:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

No Virditas is incorrect. Upon Romania's accession to the European Union Romania had to transform its welfare system to up to European standards. Romania's rappetour Baroness Emma Nicholson has hailed such progress within 10 years.

Here I provide the source: The New Romanian Orphans

Second Source: Following the closure of old-style orphanages, Romania chooses family-type alternative solutions.....

Now since I have provided valid sources to counteract Viriditas incorrect claims. It is best to ignore the ignorance and misinformation of Viriditas. Romania has obviously passed the test in which the EU gave Romania otherwise Romania would not have joined the EU in 2007.Pryde 01 (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Viriditas my mother went to Romania in 2008 to see the changes for herself on a business trip, my mum was very impressed with the changes. I went to Romania just last year with some Romanian friends of mine to see if such changes had taken place and I was amazed by such changes within 15 years of the reform process. The reform process is still continuing but so much has been reformed and fixed the issues are minor and can be fixed with more effort. I can tell you right now, the Romanian welfare system is nothing in a million years of what it was like in the 80s when my mum went there.Pryde 01 (talk) 10:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

First off, I think that it is really good to see a page on this topic. I think your page has a lot of potential but needs a lot more information. Can you go into more historical detail about Romania's shift away from communism? Can you discuss the human rights during communism compared to after communism? Can you discuss the gypsy population more? Can you discuss the orphan population more? Lhughes7 (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC) LHughes7Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human rights in Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Human rights in Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply