Talk:Hugh Brady (academic)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Hugh Brady (academic) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editYes, Hugh Brady is unpopular and deservedly so. However the aricle repeats the old canard (beloved of the Irish Times Education Correspondent) that somehow he is unpopular for being "pro-business" - as if there were something wrong with this. Such a remark reveals a lot about the anti-business attitudes of those who say it.
The real problem with the Brady team is the way in which it has applied managerial techniques, which are fine for a business corporation, to an academic institution. This is quite different to being "pro-business". Furthermore, there has been a huge increase in the number of administrators, and a corresponding loss of control of academic matters by academics themselves (for example dictation as to how one examines one's students coming from those with no relevant qualifications). Part of the problem is that so many senior UCD people (i.e. the Vice Presidents) are Medics, and display all the arrogance and authoritarionism for which Irish Medics are renowned.
Pro-business
editActually, lots of people in UCD do have a problem with his pro-business stance, and rightly so. UCD is a university, not a corporation. Education should come first, not business oportunities. Funding from the private sector can have a detrimental on the quality and honesty of the research being done.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hugh R. Brady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140908180000/http://www.businessandleadership.com/leadership/item/42112-ucd-to-establish-internatio to http://www.businessandleadership.com/leadership/item/42112-ucd-to-establish-internatio
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Too much non-personal detail in UCD section
editProf Dr Brady did a lot of good work, and some not so good, but this article lists the works of dozens or hundreds; maybe done needs moving to the UCD article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.245.4.67 (talk) 11:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)