| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hue–Da Nang Campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Hue–Da Nang Campaign has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Question
editSilly question about the lead - was the war still known locally as the "American War" even by 1975? Shimgray | talk | 16:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hue-Da Nang Campaign/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- I formatted one citation (ref#1); assume good faith for all off-line sources.
- I removed the EL, as per WP:EL, as it is already used as ref#1
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Sufficeinet detail and focus.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Suitable captions and rationales for non-free use.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- An excellent article. I am happy to list this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you very much for assessing the article.Canpark (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)