Talk:Houston Ship Channel

Untitled

Several links on this page no longer work. Qbrt 19:18, 28 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qbrt (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Houston Ship Channel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109052637/http://www.swg.usace.army.mil/items/hgnc/ to http://www.swg.usace.army.mil/items/hgnc/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080613141425/http://www.betterbay.org/html/releases/HoustonShipChannelHistory.htm to http://www.betterbay.org/html/releases/HoustonShipChannelHistory.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Houston Ship Channel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080531002449/http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40702 to http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40702
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090909175102/http://www.uthouston.edu/distinctions/archive/2007/may/archive.htm?id=795285 to http://www.uthouston.edu/distinctions/archive/2007/may/archive.htm?id=795285
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061001005030/http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/images.php3?img_id=17136 to http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/images.php3?img_id=17136

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Use of "channel"

The article uses "channel" to refer both the natural waterways of the Galveston Bay system and the dredged and widened waterways. Since the subject of the article is about the dredged and widened waterway, I propose the article would have greater clarity if "channel" is reserved for the engineered waterway. Thought? Cheers, Oldsanfelipe (talk) 15:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)