Talk:Hoteling

Tone

The tone of the "considerations" section is not properly encyclopedic for Wikipedia. Reads more like a promo or a how-to. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

in hoteling industry customer is not always right because noe a days all pracautions are taken for the clear satisfaction of customes. USSAMA RASHEEd —Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.177.50.140 (talk) 17:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Who uses it

The section was looking like self-promotion. The statements about the benefits with specifics for CCRA has nothing to do with who uses it. A very large set of examples can be given. A simple, referenced listing would be more helpful than a single anecdote. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.250.229.136 (talk) 16:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Addressing long-standing issues

I have been working on this article to address long-standing flags for citation and writing style, and generally to improve the article's coverage of the topic. I work in the industry (for AgilQuest). My intent is to improve the article according to Wikipedia's neutrality standards, not to advance my company's interests in particular. -HeyBoogie (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

There is some inconsistency in this article between the one-L and two-L spellings. The article title uses two L's ("hotelling") while the first word spells it with just one. I have searched on Google Trends; it seems that both spellings are used rather frequently. (The results are difficult to interpret, though, because of a famous statistician named Harold Hotelling.)

Regardless, the article title and the first use of the term in the article should match. I propose (as the easier solution) that we change the title of the article to "Hoteling" and change the spelling throughout to match." Any objections? HeyBoogie (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Lead sentence(s)

@Sladen: Thank you for your improvements to the lead sentence. I just made a couple further edits. I thought starting without a jargon reference "hot desking" would be better, but I agree that addressing its relation to this similar concept should be done sooner, so I moved a lower paragraph up. -HeyBoogie (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

HeyBoogie. Thank you. I can see that another edit as now been made[1] the result of which is that the second-line in the article now contains "is similar to X, and is sometimes confused with it since both methods support unassigned Y." I don't think this latest wording is likely to help our readers understand the topic or give them the kind of immediate high-level overview that we try to provide with a WP:LEAD. Would you be willing to consider a self-revert to the changes in the first paragraph? —Sladen (talk) 17:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

@Sladen: You're right, my version is not so great either. Instead of reverting, I have adjusted the lead paragraph again -- I think (hope) this addresses both your points and ours. Feel free to revert or edit as you see fit, I have the article on my watchlist and will see any edits you make. -HeyBoogie (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoteling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151011090037/http://www.workforce.com/articles/21072-office-hoteling-some-companies-offer-reservations-but-some-workers-have-reservations to http://www.workforce.com/articles/21072-office-hoteling-some-companies-offer-reservations-but-some-workers-have-reservations

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoteling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151125123408/http://www.fiercemobilegovernment.com/story/mobility-central-femas-mission-deputy-cao-says/2013-05-14 to http://www.fiercemobilegovernment.com/story/mobility-central-femas-mission-deputy-cao-says/2013-05-14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)