Talk:Host (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

plot edits

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've had to revise the plot at least twice now, removing over-descriptive - and assumptive - statements from the plot. I've also had to remove the bits about the screen credits, which have nothing at all to do with the plot.

There are three things being forgotten by some of the people copyediting the plot; first, as the sole exception to referencing, plot summaries are agreed upon as being the plot; if people disagree, then discussion here is supposed to take place. Secondly, the plot summary is not exhaustive in its detail; we are not here to chew the food for the reader to digest, but rather to present the information which the reader can choose to explore on their own. Third, if there is a contributor who has some burning need to discuss the end credits, the place for that would be in the Production section, along with cited references that mark it as being important to an understanding of the film or, at the very least, non-trivial. I myself don't believe them to be of consequence. The film, Monty Python and the Holy Grail had perhaps the most interesting - and hilarious - use of forecredits...which appears nowhere within the article, likely because no reviewer thought it important to comment about them. If they weren't notable in their best usage, they aren't notable here.

Thoughts? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

<>

Add topic