Talk:Home Improvement (TV series)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 18 November 2022

Clean Up Tag Removal?

edit

Anyone else feel that this tag can be removed? Phasedice 22:19, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, the article is still pretty unorganized and doesn't follow a very logical sequence. --DalkaenT/C 23:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit

This article has been renamed from Home Improvement to Home Improvement (TV series) as the result of a move request.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was - unopposed move to avoid confusion in line with WP:MOS. Keith D (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Home ImprovementHome Improvement (TV series)WP:NC(P) recommends "adding a parenthetical (bracketed) disambiguator to the page name: for instance when both spellings are often or easily confused." In this case, only capitalization separates Home improvement and Home Improvement. —Mika1h (talk) 21:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Unsourced Material

edit

Below information was tagged for lacking sources in 2011. Feel free to reincorporate with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Development and early recasts
=== Development and early recasts ===Home Improvement had been in the works between Tim Allen and the writing/producing team of Carmen Finestra, David McFadzean, and Matt Williams since the summer of 1990. Originally, the project's proposed title was Hammer Time, both a play on the catchphrase made popular by artist MC Hammer and the name of the fictional fix-it show within the series, which was also called Hammer Time. By the time ABC committed to the project in early 1991, Allen and his team had already changed the title to Home Improvement. The show hosted by Tim Taylor in the shooting script for Home Improvement was still called Hammer Time when the first pilot with Frances Fisher was filmed in April 1991. The catalyst for the series' name change was to represent the aspect of fixing problems within the family and home life, as well as the use of mechanics and tools. Once the second phase of the pilot was produced, with all the actors that made the final cut into the series (including Patricia Richardson), Tim Taylor's Hammer Time became Tool Time.

As mentioned above, the first pilot was produced in April 1991, with Frances Fisher playing Jill Taylor. Fisher, primarily known as a dramatic actress, was well qualified for the co-starring role but was viewed by the studio audience as not being comedic enough, and too serious in her line delivery. The producers tried to work with Fisher on adapting to the situation comedy setting, but shortly after the pilot wrapped post-production, they decided to recast her.

Before the first pilot was shot, actor John Bedford Lloyd was in the running for one of two roles; that of Tim's Tool Time co-host (originally named "Glen") and the role of Wilson. Bedford Lloyd eventually got the part of Wilson, but his agent later made claims that the actor was unaware that most of his scenes would require his face to be partially hidden behind a fence. For this reason, the crew received news just one day prior to taping the first pilot that Bedford Lloyd had dropped out. Casting immediately contacted the other actor considered for the role, Earl Hindman.

Stephen Tobolowsky was tapped to play the Tool Time co-host, Glen. However, he was still busy with a movie that was in the middle of production at the time the first pilot was to be shot. Therefore, the producers set out to cast an alternate character that would stand in as Tim's co-host for the pilot, or for however many episodes were required until Tobolowsky was available. The casting department auditioned Richard Karn, for what would be his first major appearance on a TV sitcom; the character of Al Borland was created from there. After the first few episodes completed with Patricia Richardson as Jill, Tobolowsky was still tied up with his other commitments, and Karn found himself in his role permanently when Tobolowsky decided he would have no time to do a series. Thus, the character of Glen never came into being.

"Home Improvement"'s Last Season Didn't Finish in the Nielsen Top-10

edit

"During its eight-season run, the show always finished in the top 10 in the Nielsen ratings during a season..."

While Home Improvement did finish in 10th place during season 7 in 1997-98 (with an average of 18.4 million viewers), I have a source ([1]) that says Home Improvement fell out of the Nielsen Top-10 during its eighth and final season (placing at #14 with 14.8 million viewers). And those figures are in terms of viewers, not households. This article used to have a table on its ratings in which Home Improvement's last two seasons are in viewers while its seasons 1-6 are in households. TVBuff90 made some changes to this article in October of 2017 that resulted in the removal of that table and the insistence that each of its seasons be in households (which I don't agree with in the case of HI's seasons 7 and 8) Jim856796 (talk) 13:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 18 November 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 23:54, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


– The article for the television show should be at the undisambiguated title (base name) as the primary topic for the proper noun per WP:DIFFCAPS. Users using the capitalized form are much more likely to be seeking a proper noun instead of the common noun Home improvement. Among the uses of the proper noun on enwiki, the television series is the clear primary topic. A hatnote is sufficient to get users to other pages. The disambiguation page should be moved to the capitalized form since all topics disambiguated there are capitalized (i.e., the lowercase Home improvement is not ambiguous). This setup would be analogous to other shows titled after multi-word common nouns, e.g. Growing Pains and Growing pains. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Of course users may sometimes capitalize both words when they are seeking the lowercase term, the point is that WP:HATNOTEs exist to serve such users, which is what DIFFCAPS says. Parenthetical disambiguation is not the only form of disambiguation- in fact it is meant to be used when natural disambiguation is insufficient, which is not the case here, as we have a proper noun and a common noun. Extra disambiguation violates WP:CONCISE. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment as nom It looks like the television show is getting ~6x the page views as the article on the general concept. I'm not arguing it's the primary topic for both capitalizations, as I do believe the lowercase term easily wins in terms of long-term significance, but right now anyone typing either form and seeking the television show must go through a disambiguation page, and we are doing those users a huge disservice. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – a disambig page is not a disservice, and DIFFCAPS does not really encourage this. Dicklyon (talk) 04:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.