Talk:History Workshop Journal

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Historiography is NOT history from below as is stated in the article. Historiography refers to the history of recording history, where as history from below is the study of history from the common persons perspective. I would edit to fix this article but I know not which the history workshop is supposed to focus on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.123.191.246 (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fixed?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've fixed the formatting problem. This is a good start. Problems I can see are:

the image is copyright - lots of solutions - the one Id like to think about is to freely license the journal front page if its it in your power
some of it reads like a web site and not an encyclopedia article
you don't reallt need to say "Blah says blah di blah". If the stuff is referenced then then can see who said it. it miht be appropropriate where the TES puts you in the top 43 journals
I suspect you have a close association with this journal. THats not unusual but do make sure that you say so on your user page etc and don't say anything that might sound like promotion.

Hope that helps Victuallers (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic