Talk:Highway 61 Revisited/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Moisejp in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: Four found and fixed. I don't think Robert Shelton needs to be wikilinked twice.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: One fixed and one tagged.[2] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your fixing and tagging—appreciated! Moisejp (talk) 14:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
To create the material for his next album, Dylan spent a month writing songs in his new home in the Byrdcliffe artists' colony of Woodstock in upstate New York.[31] Four days after the Newport Folk Festival, Dylan returned to Studio A on July 29, 1965, to resume work on his next album. next album - next album seems a little clunky here. as we are talkign about the very album in this article, it appears awkward.- Allreet has made nimble edit in this clunky prose. Mick gold (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The Wolk reference at blender.com, has gone dead, can't find it on the site.Done- I have removed the Blender Wolk reference. Moisejp (talk) 14:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Other online sources check out, assume GF for off-line ones to which I have no access.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Thorough and focussed
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- One image with a suitabel FUR.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Just a couple of minor points. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, everything good now, another GA for the Big Zim! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Jezhotwells, Many thanks for your GA assistance. Mick gold (talk) 09:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks a lot, Jez!! Moisejp (talk) 10:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Jezhotwells, Many thanks for your GA assistance. Mick gold (talk) 09:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)