| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Birthdate
editBias in article
editThis article is severely biased, and makes a childish attempt to paint Prof. Cohen as some sort of collaborator with African thugs. Please note the extraneous edit comments in the history of the page, where one editor notes that a particular section failed to capture that Cohen is an "evil SOB." What is this, myspace? I think the kiddies need to go home and leave the Wiki pages that aren't about pets and Britney Spears to the adults. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.251.100 (talk) 12:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
More Bias
editFurthermore, the article cites as its source a single article by the political hack James P. Lucier, perhaps best known for butchering the writings of James Monroe in a pathetic editing job. Also, to make things worse, the person who sourced this cherry picks quotes and takes them out of context to further their purile vandalism. I have attempted to make some edits which will address this, but the bias makes a complete overhaul necessary.
- Please refrain from referring to edits made in good faith as vandalism. When posting on article talkpages you can sign your comments with four tildes (~) at the end. All content needs to conform to a neutral point of view and needs sources. Perspicacite 13:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
editMy edits are not vandalism, they are merely an attempt to clean up an article which has been heavily slanted by an author with a clear cut agenda and bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.251.100 (talk) 22:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- At no point in time have I or anyone else referred to your edits as vandalism. You, incorrectly, referred to my edits as vandalism. I again remind you to sign your comments with four tildes (~). The content you add needs to be sourced and needs to conform to a neutral point of view. When commenting, please refrain from making personal attacks and incivility. Perspicacite 23:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Stub
editWhat remains is a stub. ---Dagme (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)