Talk:Healthgrades

Other potential sources

• http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0525/044-health-grades-medicine-rating-your-doctor.html
• http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/dayton-news/patient-advocate-hospital-rankings-incomplete--1064173.html?cxtype=rss_local-news
• http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/perfmeasguide/perfmeas.pdf

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Healthgrades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140730173227/http://marketplace.cms.gov/help-us/c2c-roadmap.pdf to http://marketplace.cms.gov/help-us/c2c-roadmap.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330233047/http://m.rockymountainnews.com/news/2004/oct/16/analysis-gives-health-grades-flunking-marks/ to http://m.rockymountainnews.com/news/2004/oct/16/analysis-gives-health-grades-flunking-marks/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Reviews on Dr Erik Hansen in SF, CA

Bad reviews 2601:645:C101:28A0:DD2C:9819:1E44:4A52 (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Conflicts of interest?

According to Crunchbase, Healthgrades acquired Evariant, which has "healthcare’s only Patients for Life Platform, enables providers to optimize growth through smarter patient acquisition and retention. Our customers achieve indisputable value through high-value service line growth, improving provider network utilization and planning, and extending patient lifetime value. Our solutions deliver actionable intelligence that enable healthcare providers to find, guide, and keep patients for life. Evariant is the trusted advisor to leading healthcare systems, representing over 1000 hospitals nationwide." [Healthgrades issues ratings of hospitals.]

As of 2017, Healthgrades was invested in Conversa Health, which Crunchbase describes as follows:

"Conversa enables health systems to virtually engage, monitor and manage patients for chronic care, acute discharge, perioperative, oncology, OBGYN, prevention and wellness, and more. The automated care platform engages patients at high frequency and scale, while triaging to care venues when necessary, optimizing and improving the use of telehealth e-visits, phone calls and in-person consults. Conversa’s suite of COVID-19 Virtual Care Programs is being used by innovative organizations like UCSF Health, Northwell, UNC Health, Prisma Health and University Hospitals to provide symptom checking and triage, provide check-ins with quarantined patients, deliver lab results and screen employees, patients and visitors." [That description may have been provided by the company.]

As described, Healthgrades' investment in Evaraint seems to give it an obvious conflict of interest. It purports to provide a forum for consumer reviews while its acquisition "enables providers to optimize growth through smarter patient acquisition and retention." Consumer reviews bring in no income. Nicmart (talk) 01:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Banned reviews

There are consumers who complain online that their doctor reviews have been banned by Healthgrades, though the contributors deny violating terms of services. Can this be explained by the conflicts of interest described in another section? Nicmart (talk) 01:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

According to Minc Law, Healthgrades also permits providers to challenge "fake" reviews without needing to contact the consumer posting the review. Nicmart (talk) 01:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)