This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It is difficult to imagine why this article is tagged with a "neutrality disputed" disclaimer. How could the article be more "neutral?" It consists of a brief and purely factual CV, a brief discography with 2 links, a list of compositions, and links to two interviews (which can only be accessed through participating libraries)plus a link to the composer's web site. There is nothing that could, in my opinion, be regarded as "promotional" material and nothing that could be regarded as a value judgement in the article. How, then, can any opinion on its "neutrality" even apply?
The person who posted the "neutrality disputed" tag is not identified in any way and has not taken advantage of the talk page to explain or support the tag. I would like to propose that the tag be removed until such time as such support is forthcoming, and until any defense of the "neutrality disputed" position is evaluated.
