Talk:HM Treasury
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:HM Treasury/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Where in the Wiki-universe can one consult articles about the treasury model ? (It is almost as though it were a state secret that) for decades now there's been a major department dedicated to projections based on econometric assumptions by which every major decision can be tried out for possible outcomes. It is time that some of these assumptions to be subjected to a fitness for purpose test themselves0poponax (talk) 09:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 09:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Here comes a grammar nazi!
editHi - sorry, but "her" ( or "his") in Her/His Majesty's is not a pronoun here, it's a (possessive) adjective (if it were a pronoun, it would be "Him Majesty's" when there's a king on the throne). Have done the change. Maelli (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Updates requires
editI think some of the ministers on this are no longer in the Treasury such as Felicity Buchan. RyanPLB (talk) 16:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
addition of unreferenced material
editAn anonymous editor recently added a substantial amount of prose and a large table to this article. Unfortunately, this material is almost completely unreferenced. The prose looks like original research and includes rhetorical questions. The table looks useful, but the reference used repeatedly throughout it (60 times!) is undefined so the material isn't particularly verifiable. How should these problems be addressed? -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Potential addition of discord server
editIs the official treasury discord server of enough note to add? Waity5 (talk) 19:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Waity5. Unless the Discord server is significantly covered by reliable sources, it probably wouldn't be appropriate to mention it here. An external link to the server (if HM Treasury has an official one) probably wouldn't be appropriate either as WP:ELNO says that we should generally avoid giving external links to social networking sites/chat rooms which include Discord. The Night Watch (talk) 19:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)