Talk:HMS Revenge (1892)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Revenge (1892)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 09:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria

Well-written:

With a few minor grammatical tweaks made, the article complies with policies on grammar as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article uses a sizable wealth of reliable sources. No signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article definitely seems to cover all relevant information for which reliable sources could provide. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article maintains an unbiased approach to its subject. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since at least August 2012, the article has not been subjected to edit warring or similar disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 02:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The images used in this article all serve relevant illustrative purposes, and all have suitable captions. Also, there is no risk of fair use violation due to their public domain status. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

@Wilhelmina Will:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Wilhelmina Will, despite taking this review over a month ago, nothing substantial has occurred. Will you be able to continue it? I'm pinging Sturmvogel 66 on this as well. Display name 99 (talk) 15:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm very sorry; my family and I have been preoccupied with trying to raise our new puppies for over a month now, and even my Wikipedian priorities have suffered a toll from it. I'll get on to this review right now. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I apologize again for the long wait, but I do hope it will be considered worth it, for this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!!! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)